21. Ott MA ainsi que al., The change-away from ranging from hormonal contraceptives and you will condoms one of teens, Viewpoints on Sexual and you can Reproductive Wellness, 2002, 34(1):6–fourteen.
22. Wilson EK and you can Koo Hp, Contacts ranging from low-income ladies matchmaking characteristics in addition to their birth control use, Viewpoints on Sexual and you may Reproductive Wellness, 2008, 40(3):171–179.
23. Aalsma MC ainsi que al., Household members and you may friend closeness in order to teenage sexual partners into the relationship to condom explore, Log regarding Adolescent Wellness, 2006, 38(3):173–178.
24. Sayegh MA mais aussi al., Brand new developmental organization regarding relationships quality, hormones birth prevention selection and you can condom non-play with certainly teenage feminine, Record from Adolescent Fitness, 2006, 39(3):388–395.
twenty five. Umphrey L and you will Sherblom J, Relational commitment and risks to matchmaking repairs needs: has an effect on to your condom explore, Journal of American College or university Fitness, 2007, 56(1):61–68.
twenty seven. Manning WD et al., More youthful mature dating relationship in addition to handling of sexual chance, Inhabitants Research and you may Policy Opinion, 2012, 31(2):165–185.
28. Manlove J ainsi que al., Teenager mothers within the promote care: risk factors and results for childhood in addition to their people, Look Short-term, Arizona, DC: Youngster Manner, 2011.
29. DiClemente RJ ainsi que al., Sexual risk habits from the that have earlier sex couples: a study of black colored teenage women, Sexually Transmitted Diseases 2002, 29(1):20–24.
thirty two. Fortenberry JD ainsi que al., Condom play with as the a purpose of amount of time in the and based teenage sexual dating, American Diary regarding Societal Wellness pretty women US, 2002, 92(2):211–213.
33. Manlove JS, Ryan S and you will Franzetta K, Risk and you may defensive situations on the transition in order to a first sexual experience of an older companion, Journal from Teenage Fitness, 2007, 40(2):135–143.
34. Manlove J, Ryan S and Franzetta K, Contraceptive fool around with habits round the teens’ sexual dating, papers shown during the yearly fulfilling of the Population Relationship off The usa, Philadelphia, .
thirty-five. Manning WD, Giordano Desktop computer and you will Longmore MA, Hooking up: the connection contexts out-of “nonrelationship” sex, Journal away from Teenage Lookup, 2006, 21(5):459–483.
36. Carlson MJ and Furstenberg FF, Jr, The results from multi-partnered virility to have adult tips and you can relationships, papers exhibited in the annual fulfilling of Relationship having Public Coverage Research and you can Government, Arizona, DC, .
37. Lichter DT and Graefe DR, In search of a friend? The brand new relationship and you can cohabitation histories out of unwed parents, in: Wu LL and you can Wolfe B, eds., Off Wedlock: Reasons and you can Outcomes off Nonmarital Virility, Nyc: Russell Sage Base, 2001, pp. 317–343.
forty. Kirby D, Emerging Responses 2007: Browse Findings on Software to minimize Adolescent Maternity and Sexually Transmitted Diseases, Washington, DC: National Campaign to stop Adolescent and you may Unexpected Pregnancy, 2007.
41. Kirby D, Brand new effect out-of apps to increase birth-control use certainly adult female: a peek at fresh and you can quasi-experimental knowledge, Point of views toward Sexual and you will Reproductive Wellness, 2008, 40(1):34–41.
Author’s Affiliations
Jennifer Manlove is actually program town director and you can elder search researcher, Kate Welti was browse scientist, Elizabeth Wildsmith is older browse researcher and Megan Barry was search analyst, all the from the Youngster Trend, Bethesda, MD.
History
In the first studies, that used a neighborhood-town attempt out of teens for the Kansas, Manning and you can associates nine labeled matchmaking qualities on the you to directory regarding confident characteristics (including close care about-revelation, enchanting love and you may dating salience) plus one list regarding bad attributes (instance disagreement and you may nonexclusivity). It learned that high score towards often directory was basically of this less condom consistency. Descriptive analyses and additionally recommended one to a variety of highest self-confident and you will highest bad scores is actually with the smaller condom consistency.
When you look at the for every single bullet, people was asked “Given that time off past interview, could you be in the an internet dating relationships where you thought out of your self included in two?” We considered respondents to stay an internet dating relationship when they responded yes incase the newest spouse is a recently available matchmaking companion, in the place of a partner, cohabiting partner otherwise former companion. Same-sex dating matchmaking and people where in fact the respondent got before cohabited to the companion were omitted. Complete, cuatro,013 respondents reported a recent matchmaking relationships during 2002–2005. Of your own leftover respondents, 553 just weren’t regarding the shot from inside the rounds interesting, 1,876 was indeed cohabiting otherwise partnered, and dos,542 had no current dating relationship. Participants within take to was old 18–twenty six.
Relationship connection is centered on two procedures. The first was a great 0–10 level where respondents ranked the chance which they and you can their spouse is together from inside the six months. A score regarding no shown no chance; an effective ten conveyed 100% likelihood. We categorized that it opportunities just like the reasonable (less than 6), average (6–9) otherwise highest (10). To the second measure of partnership, we included an adjustable to own if the couple had discussed wedding or cohabitation; solutions was indeed classified since the discussed neither, talked about cohabitation or chatted about relationship. (Participants just who reported that have chatted about each other cohabitation and wedding had been included on the relationships classification.)
Heterogeneous contraception effects within this longer term matchmaking also may help describe down birth prevention structure when you look at the stretched adolescent relationship, even after better likelihood of actually ever-accessibility contraceptives. thirty two, 33 Past studies have interpreted it interested in because of the positing you to definitely couples are able to sometimes go without birth prevention use in more serious relationships; thirty-two, 34 but not, our performance advise that shorter contraception have fun with are concentrated inside long-emergency room identity relationships described as large dispute and lower commitment.
Acknowledgments
20. Ku L, Sonenstein Florida and you may Pleck JH, The brand new character away from young men’s room condom explore throughout the and around the relationships, Nearest and dearest Think Point of views, 1994, 26(6):246–251.
